Category: newsletter

  • Self-Growth Tip: Spurt and Die

    Self-Growth Tip: Spurt and Die

    Consider the New Year’s resolution.

    As we all know, it’s something you make with real conviction, at a genuine turning point, when you honestly intend to change. You run hot for two weeks, limp through a third, and by the middle of February, you haven’t so much abandoned your resolution as quietly stopped mentioning it and eventually (if you’re lucky) thinking about it. By the following January, you do the same again, perhaps with more conviction and even stronger intentions… along with the feeling that what you’re actually doing is compiling evidence that you’re the kind of person who doesn’t follow through.

    What a horrible cycle.

    We could call this pattern spurt and die. And if you’re an educator, you’re about to watch 300 or so people do it at once.

    The start of a term is the most powerful fresh-start moment in the academic year. New notebooks, new intentions, new versions of ourselves. Students (and faculty) arrive determined to be organized this time. By week five, a recognizable number of those intentions are gone, and the people who made them are a little more convinced that their recurring failure to be better is simply who they are.

    But here’s what is actually happening…and it’s not a failure of motivation.

    Motivation is not the variable. The person who quits in February was not less motivated than the person who is still going. They were, if anything, more motivated…and that’s often the problem. Enormous initial energy produces an enormously ambitious plan, and an enormously ambitious plan is a plan that only works on the days you feel enormous. (It’s hard to be a whole new and improved person when you can’t find the energy to exfoliate, for example.)

    What separates a change that lasts from one that evaporates is not intensity at the start. It is whether the thing was built at a size that survives an ordinary week.

    So the question to ask about any new practice is not how committed am I? It is: what does this look like on my worst Tuesday? Not your best day, when you have time and energy and the idea still feels exciting, but your worst one…the day with the difficult meeting, the bad night’s sleep, and the thing that went wrong at home. If the practice doesn’t survive that day in some reduced but real form, it will not survive the term, no matter how much you meant it in August.

    Three characteristics tend to show up in the practices that stick:

    • It feels right while you are doing it—not just afterward, and not just in principle. Practices sustained purely on discipline are running on a fuel that depletes.
    • Its value is visible—you can point to what it produced this week. Not this year. This week.
    • It has a floor, not just a target—a version so small it’s nearly free. Ten minutes of weekly reflection is not the goal, but it is what keeps the goal alive in a week when the goal is impossible.

    You’ve heard a version of this before, usually phrased as “start small.” And that matters, but doesn’t quite capture the essence. The point isn’t modesty but that a practice you can hold on a bad week is the only kind that gets to compound, and compounding is where all the actual returns are.

    Dan Apple has put this more sharply for years: most people conclude that life does not allow sustainability of self-growth. He would insist the reverse—that life is not sustainable without it.

    So before the semester or term starts, take whatever new practice you’re planning and find its floor. Then ask one more question about your students: what floor have you given them? A course design that only works for students having a good semester is making the same mistake, on a larger scale, on someone else’s behalf.

    What is one practice you are planning for this term—and what is its worst-Tuesday version?

  • Targeting a Learning Skill: pRIORITIZING

    Targeting a Learning Skill: pRIORITIZING

    (The complete listing of learning skills is available at www.processeducation.org/cls/web/)

    Prioritizingconsistently putting the most important things first

    A note before we start. Almost everyone who says they have a time management problem has a prioritizing problem. Time management is deciding when; prioritizing is deciding what matters, and you cannot do the first honestly until you have done the second. A student (*cough*) who reorganizes their calendar without ranking anything has built a prettier container for the same chaos. So this issue, we’re going after the skill underneath.

    Where and how to TARGET it:


    Ideas for helping young children develop the skill

    Children are not short on priorities. They have exactly one, and it is whatever is in front of them. Teaching this skill is mostly teaching that “later” is a real place where things still exist.

    • The Three-Thing Morning Instead of a list, name three things and say them in order, out loud, together. The ordering is the lesson; the list is just the excuse for it.
    • First / Then Talk Narrate your own sequencing as you go. “First the shoes, then we look for the dinosaur.” Children pick up ordering as a value long before they can explain it as a rule.
    • Toy Triage Before a trip, one small bag. Which three toys come along? Making the choice is good; getting them to tell you why is much better. This is where a child first meets the idea that choosing costs something.
    • What Happens If We Don’t? Ask about the consequence of skipping something. Consequence is the tool that turns a flat list into a ranked one, and it works at every age after this one, too.

    Ideas for helping students in the liberal arts develop the skill

    Everything on a humanities syllabus can look equally important, because it is all reading and it is all assigned. Prioritizing here means learning that not every source carries the same weight in an argument, and neither does every claim in your own draft.

    • The One-Source Defense Before drafting, students name the single most important source on their list and defend the choice in three sentences. Most will discover they haven’t actually ranked anything.
    • Cut the Reading Hand out a bibliography of ten items and ask which three survive if the semester were half as long. Then have two students compare and argue. The argument is the exercise.
    • Thesis Triage Students list every claim in their own draft, rank them by how much weight each one bears, and cut the bottom third. Papers get better. More importantly, students find out how much of their writing was decoration. (There are many quotes from famous authors and critics about how a given manuscript would be tremendously improved by removing nearly all adjectives or adverbs.)
    • The Deadline Autopsy After a major paper, students map how they actually spent their hours against how they would spend them again. Do this once and it changes the next paper; do it three times and it changes the student.

    Ideas for helping students in STEM courses develop the skill

    Prioritizing in technical work looks like knowing which term dominates, which error matters, and which piece to attack first. It is a judgment skill, and it is almost never taught explicitly…we tend to model it and hope.

    • Order of Attack Before solving anything, teams rank the subproblems by which one unlocks the others. Then rankings go on the board and get compared. Watching two defensible orderings disagree teaches more than any single correct one.
    • Dominant Term This is an estimation exercise: which variable actually drives this result? Practice throwing away what does not move the number. Students trained only on exactness find this genuinely uncomfortable and that’s kind of the point.
    • The Constraint Budget A design problem with four specifications and permission to optimize only two. Forcing the trade-off into the open is what makes it a decision rather than a preference.
    • Debug Triage Give them code, a circuit, or a lab procedure containing five faults of wildly different severity. Which do you fix first, and why? The “why” is the whole point.

    Fun ideas for developing the skill with family or friends

    Most of what we call a scheduling problem is a decision we have been avoiding. But nobody builds a judgment skill by starting with the hardest judgment they face. Practice where the stakes are low and the company is good, and it will be there when the stakes are not.

    • The Ten-Minute Cut After watching a movie with friends or family, ask everyone which 10 minutes they would cut, and what breaks/changes if that cut is made. Ultimately, everyone is ranking scenes by how much weight each carries. (This is the same dynamic as learning to cut the weakest third of a writing draft, except nobody cries and there are snacks.)
    • Three Dishes for the Table Out to eat with friends, agree that the table orders only three things. Everyone advocates for one and has to defend it. What surfaces almost immediately is the difference between I want this and this is the best one for us and learning to feel that difference is most of the skill.
    • The Resource Tell Next games night, watch for the moment someone works out which resource unlocks all the others. In most games it decides the winner, and it is almost never the resource that looks most valuable. (This is the same instinct that tells an engineer which sub-problem to attack first, but again, fewer tears and nothing structural collapses.)
    • The Want-To / Need-To Split Write down everything you think you have to do this week, then sort it into two columns: things you actually want to do, and things you feel obliged to do. Work down the obligation column asking, for each item, who is actually asking me to do this? Sometimes there is a real person with a real expectation. Often there isn’t…and what you find instead is a habit, a commitment nobody else remembers making, or a version of yourself from three years ago with different priorities. Those are the ones to renegotiate or drop. (Try this one before the term starts. Ideally with somebody who will ask you about it in October. O.o)
  • Becoming an Engineer: A Course in Engineering Realization

    Becoming an Engineer: A Course in Engineering Realization

    The Introduction to Engineering course launching in Fall 2026 at Eastern Michigan University is taking a new approach to engineering. Rather than serving as a survey of the field, this course is designed as the first step in developing an engineer of the future. We’re developing a book for the course and are pleased to share the book’s Forward to The Student


    Most students begin engineering by asking, “How do I solve this problem?”

    Fewer ask, “How do I become someone who can solve problems well, consistently, and with purpose?”

    This book, Designing Engineers of the Future, is built around the second question.

    Engineering is about realization — moving from ideas to outcomes, from uncertainty to decisions, and from initial attempts to improved performance. It is also about becoming someone who can do this work effectively, responsibly, and with increasing independence.

    You will not simply learn about engineering. You will learn how to:

    • think like an engineer
    • work like an engineer
    • and develop yourself as an engineer

    Throughout this experience, you will engage with engineering through five lenses:

    • Identity & Responsibility – understanding who you are becoming and the role engineers play in society
    • Disciplined Engineering Thinking – structuring problems, making decisions, and using models effectively
    • Development & Validation – designing, testing, and improving solutions
    • Accountable Engineering Practice – working in teams, communicating clearly, and making responsible decisions
    • Continuous Improvement & Self-Directed Development – learning how to learn, reflect, and grow over time

    These lenses are not separate topics. They are different ways of approaching the same work — the work of becoming an engineer.


    How You Will Learn

    This book is not meant to be read passively. It is designed to be used.

    You will learn through a variety of activity types that structure your experience:

    • Workshops introduce key ways of thinking and working
    • Competency activities ask you to demonstrate what you can do individually
    • Team-based realization activities engage you in designing, testing, and improving solutions
    • Design reviews provide opportunities to present your thinking and receive feedback
    • Reflection activities help you learn from your experiences and improve over time

    Many of these activities will take place in class with your team and with guidance from your instructor. Other parts will require you to think independently, reflect on your performance, and take responsibility for your own learning.

    At times, you may feel uncertain or challenged. This is not a sign that something is wrong — it is a sign that you are being asked to think in new ways. Engineering is not learned by following steps alone. It is learned by working through ambiguity, making decisions, and improving over time.


    Your Role

    In this course, you are not just completing assignments. You are developing capabilities that will carry into the rest of your engineering education and beyond.

    You are expected to:

    • engage actively with your team and your instructor
    • prepare for class and contribute to shared work
    • reflect on your performance and use feedback to improve
    • take increasing responsibility for your learning

    You will be supported throughout the course, but you will not be given all the answers. Instead, you will be asked to develop them, test them, and refine them.


    What You Will Gain

    If you engage fully in this experience, you will leave with more than an introduction to engineering.

    You will develop:

    • the ability to approach unfamiliar and complex problems
    • the discipline to evaluate and improve your own work
    • the skills to collaborate and communicate effectively
    • the capacity to direct your own learning

    You may also find that this course feels different from others you have taken. It is designed not only to help you succeed here, but also to help you navigate the broader challenges of the engineering curriculum — where expectations are high, problems are not always clearly defined, and persistence is essential.


    This book is an invitation to take ownership of your learning and your development.

    The work may be demanding, and at times uncomfortable, but it is through that work that you begin to build the habits, judgment, and independence that define effective engineers.

    We look forward to seeing what you realize — and who you become.

  • Special Interest Groups for Advancing Process Education

    Special Interest Groups for Advancing Process Education

    The Academy is forming Special Interest Groups (SIGs) in the areas of lifelong learning, self-growth, and AI in the classroom. These SIGS will bring together members with shared passions in Process Education. These groups are envisioned as vibrant spaces where “birds of a feather” gather to explore cutting-edge questions, develop tools, incubate innovations, and generate collaborative scholarship that advances our field.  A SIG provides opportunities for: Distributed leadership across interest areas, Focused inquiry aligned with practitioner needs Mentorship pathways for members new to PE scholarship, and Greater visibility for emerging projects and scholarship-in-progress.

    During this year’s PE Conference, on Thursday, June 4, at 9:30am Pacific (12:30pm Eastern) a Plenary Session “PE Special Interest Groups” will be facilitated by Steve Beyerlein, Kathy Burke, and Cy Leise.

    This session is an opportunity to test interest levels, identify core collaborators, and co-define the purpose and structure of each SIG.  The three pilot SIGs will be introduced in parallel working group meetings during the second half of this session. An agenda for periodic SIG meetings throughout the rest of 2026 is planned with the following outcomes in mind:

    • Deepen community connections around each SIG theme
    • Incubate innovative models, tools, and frameworks aligned with PE philosophy
    • Identify research opportunities and practitioner projects
    • Launch collaborative pathways for publication and resource development
    • Support resource sharing, mentorship, and cross-institutional collaboration

    Please consider joining us either in person or online!

  • Designing Engineers of the Future

    Designing Engineers of the Future

    This fall, a new Introduction to Engineering course will launch in the Mechanical Engineering program at Eastern Michigan University. Rather than serving as a survey of the field, this course is designed as the first step in developing an engineer of the future.

    At its core is a guiding idea:

    Engineering is the disciplined practice of altering reality by design—and engineers are developed through engaging in that process.

    A Realization-Centered Framework

    The course is grounded in Mohamed El-Sayed’s Theory of Realization, which frames both engineering work and human development through stages of inception, conception, maturation, and becoming. Students experience realization not only as a process for creating solutions, but also as a pathway for becoming an engineer.

    To make this actionable, the course is organized around five lenses:

    • Identity & Responsibility
    • Disciplined Engineering Thinking
    • Development & Validation
    • Accountable Engineering Practice
    • Reflective Development

    These lenses emphasize both what engineers do and who engineers become, providing a consistent framework across activities, discussions, and assessments.

    From Exposure to Formation

    Many introductory courses emphasize exposure—what engineers do or what tools they use. This course instead emphasizes formation.

    Students engage in multiple realization cycles where they:

    • structure problems before solving them
    • develop and test design ideas
    • use evidence to guide decisions
    • refine solutions through iteration

    In doing so, they encounter three fundamental modes of engineering activity:

    • Problem Solving – altering the state of a situation
    • Design – altering physical reality
    • Research – altering our understanding of reality

    All three involve decision-making and movement from unacceptable to acceptable states, but differ in what aspect of reality they transform.

    Learning to Learn as a Core Capability

    A defining feature of the course is its emphasis on learning to learn. Through structured weekly reflection and improvement planning, students develop the ability to assess their performance, interpret feedback, and direct their own growth.

    This supports a critical transition:

    from following instructions to becoming a self-directed learner.

    Professional Practice from Day One

    Students also develop habits of accountable engineering practice, particularly in team settings. They learn how to conduct effective meetings, make and document decisions, and align their work with defined criteria—skills central to professional engineering.

    An Invitation

    This course represents an effort to rethink the role of introductory engineering education—not as content coverage, but as the beginning of professional formation.

    For faculty interested in integrating learning to learn into technical programs from the start, this approach offers a model worth exploring.